Traditional Strategic Planning is an important aspect of an organization’s preparation for the future. But at GrowthPlay we aim to help clients not just prepare but evolve in ways that will allow them to thrive in the future. To do that they must optimize their growth engine by asking a different set of questions than they might in traditional strategic planning. We call this process Growth Mapping because the objective is to map where you are today to where you want to be in the future, and identify the requirements, priorities, roles, and activities that will get you there—based on what matters most to you.
In the past few years, we’ve seen a shift across the legal profession as lawyers wake up to the reality that their firms do not reflect the diversity of society and are increasingly motivated to act.
The organizers of the GC Thought Leaders Experiment, a study of the data contained in the in-house evaluations of more than 1,400 legal matters, recently released a remarkable finding: the largest and most pedigreed law firms, the AmLaw 20, lag behind the rest of the AmLaw 200—that is: the AmLaw 21-200—in providing high-quality client service. In other words, the assumption that the most lauded and most expensive firms will deliver work that is, on average, superior to their smaller competitors turns out not to be supported by the data.
Judging by most of the lawyer jokes we’ve heard, the answer would seem to be “yes.” In fact, there’s a long-standing notion in popular culture that the very best lawyers are often the very worst sort of people.
For all the talk of how the traditional law firm model is being disrupted by this trend or that, the key challenge for leaders remains, as ever, how to build something that lasts, something that is bigger than the sum of its parts.